Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: GWs new policies result in Miniwargaming.com's store closing

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,314
    Quote Originally Posted by RealGenius View Post
    Yeah, but now GW is making Alliance (or trying to make them) enforce the no bits/no sprues policy. I wonder if the GW Distributors have the direct limit of $500 as well?

    I don't think it will put the bits places out of business, but it puts more pressure on them. At the very least they are still allowed to buy the bits at retail and part them out. And like others have mentioned, eBay. Try as they might, GW can't prevent you from reselling things you bought at retail.
    I think the intent of GW here is to attack the bitz stores indirectly by going after their Brick and Mortar fronts. If GW can prove/link/or otherwise 'feels' like a brick and mortar store is supplying a discounted rate to a bitz store, they will simply choose to stop doing business with that brick and mortar store -- which they can technically do.

    They aren't going after Alliance and I don't think they are expecting Alliance to enforce that policy. They are going after independent retailer fronts with the Trade Agreement/Contracts they have in order to attack the online backend.

    The margins for ordering as a direct distributor from GW are generally better for the retailers than ordering from another 3rd party distributor like Alliance. So much so, that it's almost not profitable to order from Alliance if you're already working with GW.


    But this is all conjecture and hearsay. I mean, I've only worked in the retail side with GW, met the miniwargaming guys in person, understand how Bitz stores operate, have seen the actual numbers/margins on all of theses things, worked directly with Alliance and have a business degree.... What do I know?!
    with 40k its best to get the rules straight then apply imagination and rationalize; you will only get annoyed doing it the other way round
    ~Bullymike
    Pfft - math. ROLL 6's PROBLEM SOLVED.

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,314
    I want to get that Chicken Lawyer from Futurama to comment on this Policy change. That would be awesome.
    with 40k its best to get the rules straight then apply imagination and rationalize; you will only get annoyed doing it the other way round
    ~Bullymike
    Pfft - math. ROLL 6's PROBLEM SOLVED.

  3. #33
    Senior Member RealGenius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Not Austin
    Posts
    4,907
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamHarry View Post
    I think the intent of GW here is to attack the bitz stores indirectly by going after their Brick and Mortar fronts.
    Couldn't a store pay retail for boxes and then break them down to bits? I thought GW just didn't want the reseller price for bits.

    If GW had bits again, that would be nice, but their bits service was never as good as the alternatives.
    Jim
    This is why you don't go to Jim's. --Minus67
    Rook End | The Fly Lords of Terra

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,314
    Quote Originally Posted by RealGenius View Post
    Couldn't a store pay retail for boxes and then break them down to bits? I thought GW just didn't want the reseller price for bits.

    If GW had bits again, that would be nice, but their bits service was never as good as the alternatives.
    Yes, but there are two things wrong with that as a business model:
    1) Margin on purchasing retail
    2) the Volume of boxes

    I'll address the 2nd issue first:
    The amount of boxes you would need to purchase retail would send up a flag to GW (or it wouldn't be worth it as a business). For example, if a store orders 20 boxes of Dark Vengeance as a one time purchase from GW, that probably won't send up a flag. if they did it every week, for a month or two, that probably would.

    At retail that's $100 per box...plus taxes, so you're ordering just over $2175 worth of stock per week. which means you'd need to break that down, kit it out, (shipping and packaging etc) and sell over $2175 in bits to recoup that. You'd basically need to be able to sell that entire box of stuff for $125-$150 to make a profit after supplies and labor. And that's not counting all the competition and market saturation etc... But this is just one example.

    Point is you'd have to move a lot of stuff for it to be profitable, and even then you're looking at razor thin margins IF you're buying at retail.

    Which brings me to my 1st point: The margins are paper thin if you're paying retail. The investment required to get started at retail, plus the amount of storage you'd need, work/labor you would need and organization you'd require just doesn't seem worth the return on investment. It's feasibly possible if you have free labor or you're doing it in your spare time, but that is a whole other ball of wax. If someone had a business model based on that (free labor) then I could see it working...for a while.

    Oh and I almost forgot, and Brandon can back me up on this, about the 2nd point: If GW FEELS like you (the retail store) is supplying one of these online stores with merchandise, they will just choose not to sell you stuff. Which if they play connect-the-dots long enough they will figure it out.


    TL;DR -- Yes, a store could pay retail. But it would not be reasonable in the long run.
    with 40k its best to get the rules straight then apply imagination and rationalize; you will only get annoyed doing it the other way round
    ~Bullymike
    Pfft - math. ROLL 6's PROBLEM SOLVED.

  5. #35
    Hedgefund (Admin) Darkwynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,684
    What kind of shocks me is GW has no business sense here or thought. The online stores should be the last thing they worry about. The size and capacity that these stores get limits them. That is why other business don't worry about them. Let them go because you just sell more produt in the long run. The fixed cost that come with these groups get so high that they don't function.
    Stony said...

    After reading this I have decided that the movie "Pineaple Express" should redo one of its quotes from:

    "But if you do something heroic then you'll come back as like an eagle or a dragon, or Jude Law."

    To:

    "But if you do something heroic then you'll come back as like an eagle or a dragon, or Nick Rose."

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkwynn View Post
    What kind of shocks me is GW has no business sense here or thought. The online stores should be the last thing they worry about. The size and capacity that these stores get limits them. That is why other business don't worry about them. Let them go because you just sell more produt in the long run. The fixed cost that come with these groups get so high that they don't function.
    So "GW the distributor" shouldn't care. because yes, GW will sell more product in the long run via the 3rd party online stores.

    The Problem is "GW the retailer" thinks they are fighting the "evil online stores that steal business from your FLGS" -- this is evident from the letter Matt of Miniwargaming was reading. The problem is that it's not the Online stores killing the FLGS, it's the pricing hikes....and other things. Look I could write a white paper on this move. It's just bad business. They are an old company. That's the problem. This is 2013. not 1987. change with the technology or sink.
    with 40k its best to get the rules straight then apply imagination and rationalize; you will only get annoyed doing it the other way round
    ~Bullymike
    Pfft - math. ROLL 6's PROBLEM SOLVED.

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    686
    "Roseglub!"

  8. #38
    Senior Member m3g4tr0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    1,095
    I feel bad for the online retailers, but I've bought most of my 40K stuff from eBay, and will probably continue to do so, unless it's a solo, or small unit. Then I'll just buy it from DL to support them.
    My painting blog.
    Want a pick-up game? Text me: 512-981-5340

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    686
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamHarry View Post
    I want to get that Chicken Lawyer from Futurama to comment on this Policy change. That would be awesome.
    LIKE POST +1

  10. #40
    Senior Member Psyberwolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ATX
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamHarry View Post
    So "GW the distributor" shouldn't care. because yes, GW will sell more product in the long run via the 3rd party online stores.

    The Problem is "GW the retailer" thinks they are fighting the "evil online stores that steal business from your FLGS" -- this is evident from the letter Matt of Miniwargaming was reading. The problem is that it's not the Online stores killing the FLGS, it's the pricing hikes....and other things. Look I could write a white paper on this move. It's just bad business. They are an old company. That's the problem. This is 2013. not 1987. change with the technology or sink.
    I would love to read that white paper.

    ETA: Post 666 I'm so metal!!!
    póg mo thóin
    If I tell you, "You're wrong," you'll need to click this.

    Does anybody else find it odd, by the way, that the information age has led to language becoming an oblique and imprecise tool where even the most straightforward phrasing is pored over with chicken entrails and bone tossing to divine the true meaning?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •