Thread: 2015 Wargamescon *update* 4/20/15

Originally Posted by rand0mnumb3r

You could I suppose.

Though then you would be playing with a needless handicap on an already non-competitive list. (no 6" run which is awesome for footdar, and only 3 of your squads get the +1WS/BS)

It is just annoying to try to build a list that is already non-competitive just to realize halfway through I have to handicap myself on top of it all to make it fit into some ITC format. 60 scatterlaserbikes are legit and expected, but I can't have 4 melee aspect warrior squads with +1 WS... It is just depressing lol

I think I may write a poll on the jetbike issue, but I think the main problem it seems is the idea of having 10 bikes per unit & max units. Running min squads even if they are all SL or SCan shouldn't be too big of an issue for people I would hope. Plus the threat risk of a 3 up squad is so much lower they might even be around for late game objective grabs.

I too find it annoying not to be able to run the all-aspects army (aka Biel-Tan style in my mind), but at the same time, if only concentrating on melee aspects, which are you looking at besides Scorp/Banshees/maybe Spears? Or is it just to run multiples of the same aspect?

Also, don't know since I don't have the codex in hand yet and haven't kept up with all the leaks - is it confirmed that 'auxiliary' contingents are each classed as formations?