It was pointed out to me today how bad the ITC faq is. I was fine with their army selection restrictions now that they've at least revised it, but they throw in some very arbitrary changes to the games rules in their FAQ. Unlike Adepticon, they also don't distinguish between stuff that is there to clarify ambiguity or RAW, and major parts of the game they just decided to change arbitrarily because they think it will help balance...so you can't tell what they just felt like changing and what they actually got wrong about the RAW. There are some nasty surprises in there that might really hurt some armies if they don't comb through the FAQ carefully before War Games Con.
Originally Posted by Nick
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote