Quote Originally Posted by Gutmaximus View Post
there are a couple of high level Skyrim bubbas on this forum... Have not played CoD since Black Ops/MW about a year ago.. how much different is it compared to BF3.... I am an older dude who does not twitch as fast... appreciate the tactical nuances of BF3 vs MW3...
From what I've experienced and seen, BF3 is 2/3 running around massive maps, 2/5 getting into a tank/helicopter/jet, 2/5 fighting, and 1/5 waiting to respawn. It does look fun, but the gameplay looks far more... subdued.

MW3 is high intensity, quick action, but at a nice pace. Most maps are very well designed allowing every type of player to excel. Quick respawns and killcams are great, and the game is designed with slightly worse graphics, but no matter what happens on screen, frame rate never drops below 60fps. That's why it's not as detailed as BF3. However, BF3 basically sucks if you're on foot.

Just my opinions though.