Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Stop Stealing

  1. #11
    Senior Member CRP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    4,280
    DL is a nightmare for loss prevention. The store is huge and very little employee focus if any is directed in the miniatures section. However, it would not surprise me if their loses were high across the board as the layout of the store provides tons of blind spots that are great for shoplifting shenanigans. Why make it easy for the thieves?
    "Don't take my win from me! I don't have many to claim!"
    -Dandy

  2. #12
    Fashionably Late daKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,375
    I stole the heart of a daemonnet once.
    Wrecking Crew Member

    I would punch his baby in the face! thats how i roll! ask around, it happens! ~spines

  3. #13
    Senior Member CRP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    4,280
    I lived with the devil.
    "Don't take my win from me! I don't have many to claim!"
    -Dandy

  4. #14
    Senior Member morella888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Taylor
    Posts
    1,013
    Quote Originally Posted by CRP View Post
    DL is a nightmare for loss prevention. The store is huge and very little employee focus if any is directed in the miniatures section. However, it would not surprise me if their loses were high across the board as the layout of the store provides tons of blind spots that are great for shoplifting shenanigans. Why make it easy for the thieves?
    It really is. I was just thinking about the whole thing and if it is becoming a significant thing where they might feel the need to implement policies to secure their stock, it would be better for us to be proactive and have suggestions, instead of some restrictive blanket policy that changes the way we can use their space. Specifically thinking of things like instead of bringing in minis to assemble in their packaging, putting them in a generic box. But yeah, aside from rearranging that whole wall and tables, not seeing how the giant blind spot behind the tables can be mitigated.

    It probably wouldn't come to significant changes, but the potential is unpleasant. It just makes me think of the MPAA implementing their own self-policing system to avoid external restrictions. It probably isn't as doomsday as all that though, I hope.

  5. #15
    Senior Member noodlers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    1,291
    they have cameras everywhere but not sure why they're not solving this problem.

  6. #16
    Senior Member Geist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,428
    Quote Originally Posted by noodlers View Post
    they have cameras everywhere but not sure why they're not solving this problem.
    Because cameras every where does not magically equal people enough to man them all. For each camera you need a person to watch at least some of them, and that person had to be able to get in touch with a staff member who is free right then or can be made free to go stop the theft. That is a fair amount of bodies for this task.
    Is it wrong no, does it cost extra to have one or two camera ops and one or two "guards" who do not interact with customers other than to say hi?
    I think the answer is yes that's costly and would take more bodies than DL currently has on staff.
    "The Machine will grind you down."
    Inventor of the "Chris Noble".

    Bayou 2011 "Hero to Zero"
    Lone Wolf 2011 9 3rd overall. "GateKeeper"
    2013 North Texas Battles 3rd overall and tied for 3rd best sport.

    "He's a judicious calculating master tactitician who will exploit the slightest weakness in anyone's plan and known for building intricate masterful lists that are incredibly hard to destroy and making people pay dearly for tactical mistakes. "

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Geist View Post
    Because cameras every where does not magically equal people enough to man them all. For each camera you need a person to watch at least some of them, and that person had to be able to get in touch with a staff member who is free right then or can be made free to go stop the theft. That is a fair amount of bodies for this task.
    Is it wrong no, does it cost extra to have one or two camera ops and one or two "guards" who do not interact with customers other than to say hi?
    I think the answer is yes that's costly and would take more bodies than DL currently has on staff.
    But you have to assume those who are stealing are doing it multiple times. The idea isn't to stop it as it is happening, but to identify someone doing it and not allowing them back. That review can happen at any time.
    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

  8. #18
    Member Nathan Brakel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Leander
    Posts
    72
    A camera is only a tool and unless that tool is used correctly it will have little impact; in this case a minor pre-theft deterrent.
    Last edited by Nathan Brakel; 03-04-2015 at 03:18 AM.

  9. #19
    Senior Member RealGenius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Not Austin
    Posts
    4,907
    For all we know, they could be fake cameras, just there as a deterrent.

    Thank you everyone for keeping a look out.
    Jim
    This is why you don't go to Jim's. --Minus67
    Rook End | The Fly Lords of Terra

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •