Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 62

Thread: 2015 Wargamescon *update* 4/20/15

  1. #31
    Senior Member rand0mnumb3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,015
    "An army may not have a duplicate of any Detachment.
    Note: This includes “Decurion Style” Detachments which are comprised of multiple data slates and Formations. They may not take duplicate Formations within the Detachment, although they make take duplicate Data Slate units within the Detachment if permitted to do so."

    I hope they give an exception to the "aspect host" part of the Eldar decurion. It is the only way to get asepct warriors into the decurion and you only get 3 squads per formation. It is meant to be able to be taken multiple times...

    Are Eldar just going to be limited to a maximum of 3 Aspect Warrior Squads? I was actually looking forward to playing a footdar army with all the different aspects, but now it looks almost impossible to do under their rules. Man they make it really hard to do anything fun...

  2. #32
    Senior Member Bullymike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ATX
    Posts
    1,041
    Quote Originally Posted by rand0mnumb3r View Post
    "An army may not have a duplicate of any Detachment.
    Note: This includes “Decurion Style” Detachments which are comprised of multiple data slates and Formations. They may not take duplicate Formations within the Detachment, although they make take duplicate Data Slate units within the Detachment if permitted to do so."

    I hope they give an exception to the "aspect host" part of the Eldar decurion. It is the only way to get asepct warriors into the decurion and you only get 3 squads per formation. It is meant to be able to be taken multiple times...

    Are Eldar just going to be limited to a maximum of 3 Aspect Warrior Squads? I was actually looking forward to playing a footdar army with all the different aspects, but now it looks almost impossible to do under their rules. Man they make it really hard to do anything fun...
    You can include as many aspects as possible with a 2 detachment limit. So, CAD+eldcurion (including aspect host), or cad plus aspect host. or cad plus allies. i think non-repetition of detachments is good; however, allowing allied as same faction is totally bad, no point to that - the whole point to the little allied detachment is that it comes from a different faction. wtf.

    and i take back what i said earlier. i can handle their detachment limit (at least its not called 'sources' anymore), but i did not notice in my once-over that they still will include the adulterated invisibility and rerollable saves grossness, and the additional bonuses for playing against lords of war. those are all still really pointless and biased limitations.
    "The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age."

  3. #33
    Senior Member rand0mnumb3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Bullymike View Post
    You can include as many aspects as possible with a 2 detachment limit. So, CAD+eldcurion (including aspect host), or cad plus aspect host. or cad plus allies. i think non-repetition of detachments is good; however, allowing allied as same faction is totally bad, no point to that - the whole point to the little allied detachment is that it comes from a different faction. wtf.

    and i take back what i said earlier. i can handle their detachment limit (at least its not called 'sources' anymore), but i did not notice in my once-over that they still will include the adulterated invisibility and rerollable saves grossness, and the additional bonuses for playing against lords of war. those are all still really pointless and biased limitations.
    The problem with taking a eldcurion+cad is that you end up with at a minimum of

    2 farseers
    15 jetbikes
    1 vyper
    1 warlock

    and if you don't want to take jetbikes then you are talking

    2 farseers
    50! guardians
    Warwalker
    vyper
    artilery platform

    So either you end up with 15 jetbikes and people hate you or you take 50! guardians.

    Both options make it so you don't have any points left for the actual aspect warrior part of the army.

  4. #34
    Senior Member Bullymike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ATX
    Posts
    1,041
    what about just cad plus formation. anway bikes are just bikes unless you go full scatlasertard
    "The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age."

  5. #35
    Senior Member rand0mnumb3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Bullymike View Post
    what about just cad plus formation. anyway bikes are just bikes unless you go full scatlasertard
    You could I suppose.

    Though then you would be playing with a needless handicap on an already non-competitive list. (no 6" run which is awesome for footdar, and only 3 of your squads get the +1WS/BS)

    It is just annoying to try to build a list that is already non-competitive just to realize halfway through I have to handicap myself on top of it all to make it fit into some ITC format. 60 scatterlaserbikes are legit and expected, but I can't have 4 melee aspect warrior squads with +1 WS... It is just depressing lol

  6. #36
    Senior Member morella888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Taylor
    Posts
    1,013
    Quote Originally Posted by rand0mnumb3r View Post
    You could I suppose.

    Though then you would be playing with a needless handicap on an already non-competitive list. (no 6" run which is awesome for footdar, and only 3 of your squads get the +1WS/BS)

    It is just annoying to try to build a list that is already non-competitive just to realize halfway through I have to handicap myself on top of it all to make it fit into some ITC format. 60 scatterlaserbikes are legit and expected, but I can't have 4 melee aspect warrior squads with +1 WS... It is just depressing lol
    I think I may write a poll on the jetbike issue, but I think the main problem it seems is the idea of having 10 bikes per unit & max units. Running min squads even if they are all SL or SCan shouldn't be too big of an issue for people I would hope. Plus the threat risk of a 3 up squad is so much lower they might even be around for late game objective grabs.

    I too find it annoying not to be able to run the all-aspects army (aka Biel-Tan style in my mind), but at the same time, if only concentrating on melee aspects, which are you looking at besides Scorp/Banshees/maybe Spears? Or is it just to run multiples of the same aspect?

    Also, don't know since I don't have the codex in hand yet and haven't kept up with all the leaks - is it confirmed that 'auxiliary' contingents are each classed as formations?
    Last edited by morella888; 04-24-2015 at 06:39 PM.

  7. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by morella888 View Post
    I think I may write a poll on the jetbike issue, but I think the main problem it seems is the idea of having 10 bikes per unit & max units. Running min squads even if they are all SL or SCan shouldn't be too big of an issue for people I would hope. Plus the threat risk of a 3 up squad is so much lower they might even be around for late game objective grabs.

    I too find it annoying not to be able to run the all-aspects army (aka Biel-Tan style in my mind), but at the same time, if only concentrating on melee aspects, which are you looking at besides Scorp/Banshees/maybe Spears? Or is it just to run multiples of the same aspect?

    Also, don't know since I don't have the codex in hand yet and haven't kept up with all the leaks - is it confirmed that 'auxiliary' contingents are each classed as formations?
    All auxiliary selections except the "Wraith Constructs" and "Engines of Vaul" is a formation. The "Living Legends" and "Heroes of the Craftworld" Regents of the Warhost are also data slates and not formations.

  8. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by rand0mnumb3r View Post
    "An army may not have a duplicate of any Detachment.
    Note: This includes “Decurion Style” Detachments which are comprised of multiple data slates and Formations. They may not take duplicate Formations within the Detachment, although they make take duplicate Data Slate units within the Detachment if permitted to do so."

    I hope they give an exception to the "aspect host" part of the Eldar decurion. It is the only way to get asepct warriors into the decurion and you only get 3 squads per formation. It is meant to be able to be taken multiple times...

    Are Eldar just going to be limited to a maximum of 3 Aspect Warrior Squads? I was actually looking forward to playing a footdar army with all the different aspects, but now it looks almost impossible to do under their rules. Man they make it really hard to do anything fun...
    You need more than 3 squads of aspect warriors with BS/WS 5/6 models and re-roll morale/pinning/fear with an auto 6" run to have fun? You can still fit all the aspects into a CAD. Dire avengers are still troops. There are still 3 elite slots for Banshees/Scorpions/Fire Dragons, 3 FA slots for the Warp Spiders, Swooping Hawks, and Shining Spears, as well as 3 heavy slots for dark reapers. Lack of ability to take aspect warriors shouldn't be a complaint.
    Last edited by ccrraazzyyman; 04-24-2015 at 07:32 PM.

  9. #39
    Senior Member Bullymike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ATX
    Posts
    1,041
    im sayin
    "The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age."

  10. #40
    Fashionably Late daKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,375
    Someone will figure it out but I really want to start seeing Footdar armies again. We shall see, we shall see.
    Wrecking Crew Member

    I would punch his baby in the face! thats how i roll! ask around, it happens! ~spines

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •