You got cover at that wall where you smoked my hacker. I will agree that this terrain was more absolute in I either see you or I don't. I think more half inch scatter for cover and one inch scatter for blocking is needed. Overall I liked this mission. The game was very swingy which I liked. I think the security BTS on the terminals was a bit high and that really bit Matt in butt.
póg mo thóin
If I tell you, "You're wrong," you'll need to click this.
Does anybody else find it odd, by the way, that the information age has led to language becoming an oblique and imprecise tool where even the most straightforward phrasing is pored over with chicken entrails and bone tossing to divine the true meaning?
Haha, the BTS didn't matter. I rolled 4 20's, 2 19's, and 3 17's. I do agree -6 was a bit rough with a defensive hacker on the board, but I had other problems!
BTW E.H. - for what it's worth we didn't really have a defined end condition, so we went with "the game is over when neither player has hackers on the table any more."
Originally Posted by Rigphoria
Any word on the Week 2 Scenario?
WAR Games Con 2010: Warmachine Steamroller Favored Opponent
WAR Games Con 2011: Narrative Favorite Player (Armageddon Track)
WAR Games Con 2013: Narrative Favorite Teammate (Heresy/Sunday Blend)
Stickied in the forum now.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote