Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Wound allocation for Dummies

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    545

    Wound allocation for Dummies

    So wound allocation for dummies:

    Same Save:
    1. Roll to Hit
    2. Roll to Wound
    3. Make Saves
    4. Allocate unsaved wounds to models beginning with closest models
    5. If a wound is allocated to a character make a single look out sir roll
    6. If successful the model that took the look out sir roll takes wound.
    7. Begin allocating again with the character who is now the closest. Repeat as necessary until all wounds are accounted for.


    Mixed Save:
    1. Roll to Hit
    2. Roll to Wound
    3. Allocate Wounds to models beginning with closest models
    4. Make save for allocated wound. If the closest model is a character take look out sir as appropriate.
    5. If lookout sir is made, model makes save and is removed if save is failed.
    6. Allocate next wound beginning with closest model and repeat above until all wounds have been allocated.


    Multi-wound models function the same way. Wounds are simply allocated to the closest multi-wound model until dead.

    In a unit of multi-wound models, individual models attempt the look out sir, and when they succeed they take the wound/unsaved wound. Allocation begin again with the closest model and is repeated until all wounds/unsaved wounds are resolved.

    Only a single model may attempt to make a look out sir roll for any given wound or unsaved wound.

    Does this look correct?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Psyberwolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ATX
    Posts
    1,176
    Yes. The caveat being a single model with 6" takes the look out sir rolls.

    What is unclear, in units with the same save, is if the model who is taking the wound is nominated before the look out sir or if the roll is made and the unsaved wound is then assigned to a model.
    póg mo thóin
    If I tell you, "You're wrong," you'll need to click this.

    Does anybody else find it odd, by the way, that the information age has led to language becoming an oblique and imprecise tool where even the most straightforward phrasing is pored over with chicken entrails and bone tossing to divine the true meaning?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    545
    I think Kirby does a good job of clarifying it complete with diagrams, quotes and page numbers
    http://www.3plusplus.net/2012/07/bac...=Google+Reader

    but essentially look out sir is declared and rolled. If successful the new model becomes the allocated model for the wound/unsaved wound. The wound/unsaved wound is resolved, and you go back to allocating.

    Someone please make sure I have that right.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by Psyberwolfe View Post
    What is unclear, in units with the same save, is if the model who is taking the wound is nominated before the look out sir or if the roll is made and the unsaved wound is then assigned to a model.
    It ultimately doesn't matter unless something would happen when a model passes a save (like the necron unit with the deflector shields). You always pick the model who you would want to fail the save, and if they fail, they get the wound. If they pass, it doesn't matter who passed it, you passed your save.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rigphoria
    lying and bluffing is shockingly easy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Splug
    You say that, but if I'm dealt a Cylon card I've got about half a turn before Steve throws me out an airlock
    Quote Originally Posted by Rigphoria
    steve can detect his own kind. that doesn't count.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by evil homer View Post
    Someone please make sure I have that right.
    It sounds right to me. Basically, the thing to know is the change from 5th is that in a same-save unit, "failed saves are allocated," not "wounds to be saved".

    Oh, it may be worth having a caveat that your opponent decides which wounds to allocate first (by AP, etc). It may make a difference if the closest models are or are not in cover.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rigphoria
    lying and bluffing is shockingly easy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Splug
    You say that, but if I'm dealt a Cylon card I've got about half a turn before Steve throws me out an airlock
    Quote Originally Posted by Rigphoria
    steve can detect his own kind. that doesn't count.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    545
    It sounds right to me. Basically, the thing to know is the change from 5th is that in a same-save unit, "failed saves are allocated," not "wounds to be saved".
    In the case of same save units it is failed saves.
    In mixed armor units it is wounds to be saved.

  7. #7
    Senior Member RealGenius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Not Austin
    Posts
    4,907
    I can't believe someone hasn't made a flow chart for this yet.
    Jim
    This is why you don't go to Jim's. --Minus67
    Rook End | The Fly Lords of Terra

  8. #8
    Senior Member Psyberwolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ATX
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by RealGenius View Post
    I can't believe someone hasn't made a flow chart for this yet.
    You could!
    póg mo thóin
    If I tell you, "You're wrong," you'll need to click this.

    Does anybody else find it odd, by the way, that the information age has led to language becoming an oblique and imprecise tool where even the most straightforward phrasing is pored over with chicken entrails and bone tossing to divine the true meaning?

  9. #9
    Senior Member RealGenius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Not Austin
    Posts
    4,907
    Quote Originally Posted by Psyberwolfe View Post
    You could!
    Oh, you know I will (unless someone already has or does it first).
    Jim
    This is why you don't go to Jim's. --Minus67
    Rook End | The Fly Lords of Terra

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    545
    I heard Jim Volunteer

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •