Thread: 30k in the 40k narrative

"the idea of playing against primarchs and infantry/vehicles that in a regular 40k game you either would never encounter or be limited to one as it would be a relic of the armoury but in 30k there would be no such limitations is indeed a scary prospect."

This is literally everything that is wrong with people who think 30K is OP. The **** you can fight in 40K is SO MUCH WORSE!

Originally Posted by Warboel

Sorry to ruffle your feathers, but I did preface my post by saying that I am an inexperienced player and I have never played a 30k game, so I was merely contributing my opinion on the matter. Nothing more, nothing less. You are free to accept or reject any opinions you encounter same as I, but it might help your cause a little more if you calmly and concisely state your opinion and explain why you have taken the position you have instead of pulling a random quote from my post and making it sound like your position is obviously the right one with no if, ands, or buts involved or necessary. Like I mentioned, I am a new player with less than 20 games under my belt and by no means do I consider myself a pro in any way, but I can read profiles, rules, and point costs and interpret them to the best of my ability. I'm not saying I will never concede to your point of "The **** you can fight in 40K is SO MUCH WORSE!" I just haven't been convinced yet that you are right simply because you say you are.

If you have no experience, then you don't get to say 30k is OP.

Originally Posted by Warboel

And you're obviously right because you say you are, how could I ever have been so dense.

Yeah How could you?

Originally Posted by noodlers

Be nice you are better than this

When everyone stops giving hollow reasons to be against 30k, maybe I will care.