Why would an Assault force have Tacticals instead of an Assault option? Assault Marines maybe...Quote:
Originally Posted by daKing
Agreed on excluding Athaloc Jim, I forgot he removed Rage..lol..
Printable View
Why would an Assault force have Tacticals instead of an Assault option? Assault Marines maybe...Quote:
Originally Posted by daKing
Agreed on excluding Athaloc Jim, I forgot he removed Rage..lol..
Ok assault squads are cool. As long as its a troop. Why the free ex armor?
Keeps them moving.
What about instead of EA, changing the Machine Spirit to the old version-- that also allows a move straight ahead?
Howling Griffons
The Red and Yellow: Stalwart Defense/Unyielding Offense
2 full tac squads (the red)
2 full termi squads (the yellow)
the formation gains fleet USR and +1 cover safe in terrain (cannot be combined with other save modifiers)
should have a character requirement too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulwark
What about Sternguard as Troops instead of the Tacs? Seems more fitting for "Stalwart Defense"? Or maybe "Select one squad of each the Sternguard and Terminators in the formation. These squads are considered Troops."
But, yeah, I agree with Adam, needs a SC, preferably the Fly Lord one. :)
why would termis get fleet? or stealth for that matter?
Special character gets to reroll against ICs. Maybe instead have the units re-roll to wound one player turn?
Or the unit the character joins can re roll to wound while the SC is in the unit ?Quote:
Originally Posted by RealGenius
Stubborn would be better..