Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: 'Ard Boyz Scenarios up

  1. #1
    Senior Member Hogleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    2,215

    'Ard Boyz Scenarios up

    Quote Originally Posted by RealGenius View Post
    Your "booty > money > toy soldiers" logic is indeed irrefutable.
    http://www.centexwar.com/warroom/group.php?groupid=8

  2. #2
    Senior Member RealGenius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Not Austin
    Posts
    4,907
    That doesn't look like a GW PDF to me.

    Not to imply that it is fake or anything, but that it looks pretty half-assed.
    Last edited by RealGenius; 07-28-2011 at 02:28 PM.
    Jim
    This is why you don't go to Jim's. --Minus67
    Rook End | The Fly Lords of Terra

  3. #3
    Senior Member Hogleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    2,215
    It's from their website. Look at the link. here's the truncated link in non-forum friendly text:

    http://www.games-workshop.com%2FMEDI...dDx-XQ&cad=rja
    Last edited by Hogleg; 07-28-2011 at 03:49 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by RealGenius View Post
    Your "booty > money > toy soldiers" logic is indeed irrefutable.
    http://www.centexwar.com/warroom/group.php?groupid=8

  4. #4
    Haemonculus CrusherJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX...y'all.
    Posts
    711
    Not exactly what I'd call "complex"...though I do like the "traitor" scenario. Good idea, that one.
    Malory: Jesus, God, Sterling. School girls?!
    Archer: Oh, those are just costumes.
    Malory: And I suppose that makes it better?
    Archer: Doesn't it?

  5. #5
    Senior Member muffinman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    North Austin
    Posts
    1,398
    the second scenario is... odd. I have the feeling a lot of people will forget bits of it. its the only scenario with a set 6 turns, only scenario that doesn't allow outflanking, and it has a turn 6 nightfighting rule...

    the traitor scenario looks like it could be fun. maybe it would be a cool idea for one of the escalation league scenarios in the future?

    Doesn't look like I'll be missing much. those scenarios don't really make me regret bowing out of 'ard boyz this year. though my orks would have probably enjoyed the liberal dose of night fighting in those missions.
    my blog - Skorne and Retribution

    "I am... unfamiliar with this 'Molik Karn missile'. Is it something I should be concerned with?" - PP Forum battle report

    "Luck is statistics taken personally" - Penn Jillette

  6. #6
    Fashionably Late daKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,375
    Yeah, I was annoyed to see that mission 2 has no Outflanking... especially since that is the best mission for it. Outflanking really sucks in KP/VP missions, its only real use is in Sieze Ground. Oh well.
    Wrecking Crew Member

    I would punch his baby in the face! thats how i roll! ask around, it happens! ~spines

  7. #7
    Senior Member Hogleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    2,215
    Too many nightfights...
    Quote Originally Posted by RealGenius View Post
    Your "booty > money > toy soldiers" logic is indeed irrefutable.
    http://www.centexwar.com/warroom/group.php?groupid=8

  8. #8
    Hedgefund (Admin) Darkwynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,684
    Horrible missions... they seemed rush more then anyrhing.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Hogleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    2,215
    I think they were definitely rushed. It looks like you wrote it with all the truncated words, subject verb agreement, and tense issues.

    The traitor mission is cool, but it's still just straight kill points. There should certainly be multiple mission objectives.

    In the third mission the deployment is Dawn of War? So basically all these ****ing missions have night fights? Or is it just the dawn of war deployment rules, without the night fight special rule?
    Quote Originally Posted by RealGenius View Post
    Your "booty > money > toy soldiers" logic is indeed irrefutable.
    http://www.centexwar.com/warroom/group.php?groupid=8

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    965
    This looks like a pre-release version of the missions, probably intended for play testing before being finalized. The easiest way to prevent people from having an advantage due to leaked data is to just publish it all earlier; no one cares if you steal what was freely given. I would expect some additional polish (both to the presentation and to the overall mission rules) in the next two weeks.

    The traitor mission has one huge key to it: it gives you a reasonable way to beat a paladin army on kill points.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rigphoria
    lying and bluffing is shockingly easy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Splug
    You say that, but if I'm dealt a Cylon card I've got about half a turn before Steve throws me out an airlock
    Quote Originally Posted by Rigphoria
    steve can detect his own kind. that doesn't count.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •