Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: New Battle Demi-Companies and BC

  1. #11
    Haemonculus CrusherJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX...y'all.
    Posts
    711
    Technically both Pinion Battle Demi-Company and Stormlance Battle Demi-Company (note the capitalization) are considered Core choices for the Gladius (at least they're called that in Army Builder). They contain the same restrictions as the Battle Demi-Company (requiring the same command in either a Captain or Chaplain) and most of the same composition rules (with minor differences). The problem -- to me, anyway -- as why there's even a question is that they're called XXX Battle Demi-Company. That's a pretty specific name. If it were named Stormlance Battle Formation there would be no question. But using that specific name makes me think you can use them.

    In C:SM, the description of the Gladius Strike Force (the detachment in which you place Battle Demi-Companies in to create a Battle Company) says this:

    "RESTRICTIONS:
    This Detachment must include at least one Core choice and one Auxiliary choice. It may
    include up to one more Core choice, up to three Command choices and any number of
    additional Auxiliary choices, in any combination. Only the datasheets listed here can be
    included in this Detachment.
    All units in the Detachment must have the Space Marines
    Faction and must be drawn from the same Chapter." (Emphasis mine)

    Now, this would seem to indicate the death-knell for my argument, however, we all know that this is true at the time of C:SM's publication. This does not mean that further rules could not (and more than likely would, considering GW's history) modify the restrictions on the GSF.

    Personally, I'm of the opinion that unless FAQ'd, this one is open to interpretation.

    NOW, because I like rulesy questions, I ask a new one:

    In all of the new detachments where the Skyhammer Annihilation Force is allowed, it's an Aux choice. Does this mean it is also an Aux choice in the Gladius? Again, remember that Skyhammer was released only on the web previously. Unfortunately I don't know enough about how these things work to be able to make even an educated guess. Does anyone know if the original release included it as an Aux choice in GSF or not?

    What say you?
    Last edited by CrusherJoe; 04-19-2016 at 01:19 PM.
    Malory: Jesus, God, Sterling. School girls?!
    Archer: Oh, those are just costumes.
    Malory: And I suppose that makes it better?
    Archer: Doesn't it?

  2. #12
    Senior Member CRP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    4,280
    The Wulfen book has the same issue with the Death Pack formation. It is a core choice. However, it is not listed in the "Decurion" map in the Wulfen Supplement. But, the Wulfen book says that it IS a supplement meant to add to or replace entries in Codex SW. That is why I can't understand those that still try to use the Iron Priest as an Elite. It states very clearly in the codex that it REPLACES entries in Codex SW.
    "Don't take my win from me! I don't have many to claim!"
    -Dandy

  3. #13
    Senior Member noodlers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    1,291
    the gladius is specific to two battle demi companies each led by a captain and chaplain. it's a very special unit with special command benefits. after reading the codex i do not get the impression it is meant to be constructed with a compilation of multiple cores and auxes. also, i would not cite army builder as a reason for allowing something. army builder is not good at the decurion style formations and their command benefits.

  4. #14
    Haemonculus CrusherJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX...y'all.
    Posts
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by noodlers View Post
    the gladius is specific to two battle demi companies each led by a captain and chaplain. it's a very special unit with special command benefits. after reading the codex i do not get the impression it is meant to be constructed with a compilation of multiple cores and auxes. also, i would not cite army builder as a reason for allowing something. army builder is not good at the decurion style formations and their command benefits.
    Actually...no, it isn't. It's the only Detachment besides CAD or an Allied Detachment Marines have access to in C:SM. And it very much it built around Command, Core, and Aux choices.
    Malory: Jesus, God, Sterling. School girls?!
    Archer: Oh, those are just costumes.
    Malory: And I suppose that makes it better?
    Archer: Doesn't it?

  5. #15
    Senior Member noodlers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    1,291
    Quote Originally Posted by CrusherJoe View Post
    Actually...no, it isn't. It's the only Detachment besides CAD or an Allied Detachment Marines have access to in C:SM. And it very much it built around Command, Core, and Aux choices.
    yes that is correct i was uninformed about the gladius

  6. #16
    Haemonculus CrusherJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX...y'all.
    Posts
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by noodlers View Post
    yes that is correct i was uninformed about the gladius
    It happens to everyone...I wouldn't worry about it too much.
    Malory: Jesus, God, Sterling. School girls?!
    Archer: Oh, those are just costumes.
    Malory: And I suppose that makes it better?
    Archer: Doesn't it?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •