Daemon FAQ

https://www.facebook.com/15756824760...type=3&theater

Again, many of these actually clarify weird situations, which is good, but some of the FAQs are CLEARLY already answered in the standard rules (often in multiple places, and consistently).

Q: Does FNP stack from multiple Tzeentch Warpflames?
A: Have you ever read ANY entry in ANY codex that mentions Warpflame, because they all say clearly that the FNP result does stack? Still, I think we'll devote one of a limited number of answer spots to this question. Good job, everyone! [pats themselves on the back and sleeps soundly that night].

They .....are......doing.....the ........best ......that ......they .........can.......!!!.......!!!!......!!!!!...... ....!!!!!.....!!!!!!......!!!!!!!!....


Why you gotta be a hater, Dawg?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mr.petey

Again, many of these actually clarify weird situations, which is good, but some of the FAQs are CLEARLY already answered in the standard rules (often in multiple places, and consistently).

Q: Does FNP stack from multiple Tzeentch Warpflames?
A: Have you ever read ANY entry in ANY codex that mentions Warpflame, because they all say clearly that the FNP result does stack? Still, I think we'll devote one of a limited number of answer spots to this question. Good job, everyone! [pats themselves on the back and sleeps soundly that night].

---

What makes you think they have a limited number of answer spots? Is space on a variable number of typed pages a limited resource now? Sh*t, we better call off this whole Internet thing, it must be a huge waste of this limited resource.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Dude

What makes you think they have a limited number of answer spots?

---

Um, I guess the fact that FAQs never answer every single question because logistically that's impossible. It's not an issue of whether or not Internet "real-estate" is at a premium. It's obvious from the nature of every FAQ ever created, and - I'd add - common sense, that all FAQs are limited to a certain number, some number, of answers. Also, duh.

CRP: I agree with you that they are doing the best they can. I just wish their best was better, AND that it avoided creating answers for things that clearly aren't real questions. It doesn't ruin the game for me. It just bothers me. It's bad business practice (logic practice, common sense practice, whatever) to spend time doing unnecessary work, even if that unnecessary work is the "best" they can do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mr.petey

CRP: I agree with you that they are doing the best they can. I just wish their best was better, AND that it avoided creating answers for things that clearly aren't real questions. It doesn't ruin the game for me. It just bothers me. It's bad business practice (logic practice, common sense practice, whatever) to spend time doing unnecessary work, even if that unnecessary work is the "best" they can do.

---

Oh, they are THE best at bad business practices.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mr.petey

Um, I guess the fact that FAQs never answer every single question because logistically that's impossible. It's not an issue of whether or not Internet "real-estate" is at a premium. It's obvious from the nature of every FAQ ever created, and - I'd add - common sense, that all FAQs are limited to a certain number, some number, of answers. Also, duh.

---

The only limit is your imagination...

Attachment 1426

(PS, I am totally trolling you bro)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Dude

The only limit is your imagination...

Attachment 1426

(PS, I am totally trolling you bro)

---

;)

Rainbow unicorns?! Well now I've seen EVERYTHING!

Quote:

---

(PS, I am totally trolling you bro)

---

Also also, yeah I know, and don't tell CRP, but I don't mind. :D