Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 91 to 95 of 95

Thread: Wargames con 2012 Feedback

  1. #91
    Senior Member Beamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,372
    The counter argument was that putting the narrative event close to the GT would have made it harder for us to hear each other, which I totally agree with.

  2. #92
    Senior Member m3g4tr0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    1,095
    Why not place the narrative peeps where the Warmahordes peeps were, and slide the Warmahorders to where the open tables were. That leaves a nice corner for the open tables. While not ideal, since the open tables will kind of be out in the boonies, it might entice people to cough up the extra cash to be in a tournament, so they won't be relegated to the corner of shame.
    My painting blog.
    Want a pick-up game? Text me: 512-981-5340

  3. #93
    Senior Member CRP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    4,280
    I would hardly call playing for fun, shameful.
    "Don't take my win from me! I don't have many to claim!"
    -Dandy

  4. #94
    Senior Member m3g4tr0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    1,095
    Quote Originally Posted by CRP View Post
    I would hardly call playing for fun, shameful.
    Nothing's wrong with it. I played the open tables for the last two years. However, they shouldn't have been placed where they were. It made a huge, near-empty hole on the floor and detracted from the action.
    My painting blog.
    Want a pick-up game? Text me: 512-981-5340

  5. #95
    Senior Member Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    669
    It would be called "the corner of shame" regardless of who or what is playing on it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •